nikiraapana.com

living outside the dialectic

options
The importance of more than two options

For some known reason, our choices are often limited (simplified) to two. Like the presidential election between the Democrats and the Republicans, sides are boiled down into twos, as in pro-life OR pro-choice, right OR left, conservative OR progressive, etc. This same game is played between capitalism and communism, between logger and greenie, between urban sprawl and urban renewal, and between thousands of other smaller debates. Dialectical thinking requires creating and advancing false dilemmas between two simplified "opposing ideas." 

At the ACL, our studies have shown us the ultimate goal of using all these posed sides was always to pave the way for introducing global government solutions (which eliminates all national systems of law and political economy). It's the ultimate coup for the hereditary global government planners. They introduced the entire process of finding a "balance" between two "sides." They've always called it a dialectial synthesis. Once each merger between their contrived opposites is complete, the "outcome" (often tooted as a "new idea") itself becomes a new "side," and then another "side" emerges to combat it... and this produces a newer synthesis... which becomes another side... which produces another side, and then another synthesis.

Our Anticommunitarian Manifesto includes the claim that the dialectic is purposefully confusing and misleading, and our conclusion "proves" political and legal Communitarianism is the final synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic.  (I say "proves" in quotes because the Communitarians have yet to dispute or contest our published findings.)  The Hegelian dialectic is a tool for manipulating public opinion to support (or ignore) Third Way solutions. Every new response to global terrorism that utilizes a balance between individual liberty and the "common good" is a communitarian dilemma. Everything from the drug/poverty/crime/obesity wars to Community Economic Development to the National Animal Identification system to the National ID database are communitarian ideas. Hate and internet crimes are communitarian legal concepts,  and the EU, the NAU, CAFTA and UN-NATO efforts to promote international peacekeeping are all part of Rebuilding a Communitarian world. Homeland Security is their invention, and FEMA (with the complete reorganization of US agencies under HS) is the US leader in the emerging global communitarian system.  The European Union publishes the best information on communitarian integration.

Opting out of the dialectic

Breaking out of the chains imposed by dialectical thinkers is only painful in the beginning. It is extremely difficult to accept almost every question posed to American voters is a dialectical question. It's a terrible thing to realize the phony dialectic is the foundation for every political party in the USA. It's the foundation for all the "new" sciences, it's the basis for every newly revised local land use ordinance, it's the formula for the "new" international religion, and it's the legal standard for international law.  Clearly the dialectic is the best tool the other side has.

Options are choices

The Communitarian Platform sets the guidelines for the emerging global synthesis. But if we look closer at their agenda, it's only their contrived dialectical arguments and debates that lead to their globalist solutions. This means it's only our participation (or complicit acceptance) that limits our own playing fields to "only two choices." Once we get out of the limitations imposed by dialectical thinkers, our entire perception of the world changes. Suddenly anything is possible because nobody knows the whole truth about anything. This can be both scary and exhilarating, but it's never boring. Eventually, after there's nothing left but our personal beliefs and an individual connection to our core's Higher Power, all of our senses come back into play, including our sense of humor.

One thing is abundantly clear to me, and that is ALL their ideas and options lead to death and total destruction of the human race. Alternative ideas for living are an essential ingrediant to living free from their dialectical plan.

Options require choices

Finding and thinking about available choices requires the time to study. This is the most difficult phase of moving our lives in original directions. To step outside the box (use the "Matrix" if you need a good visual), you have to begin by seeking the truth about the things that should be easy to verify. You will quickly find that they cannot always be rationally explained and that most of what you do find can be classified as propaganda. The way to identify propaganda is if the same non-explanation is repeated the same way on many different sources. When history has been rewritten by dialectical scholars they usually stick to the same story (see Chaitkin and Tarpley's Unauthorized Biography of George Bush).  The authors of the Matrix Trilogies came right out and explained they based their entire story on the Hegelian dialectic (matrix101). 

Like any good dialectical argument, the Matrix story's "lie" is in their concept that we need someone else (from Zion) to free us from our bondage, like a prophet, a hero or a savior to lead the way.  The truth is, only we can free ourselves, only we can open the doors that lead ourselves and our people back to individual, state, and national freedom. We have to make the choice to really SEE what's happening in our own neighborhoods first, and then we can at least make the choice to bury our heads back into the sand or to actively join the ranks.

Achieving liberty and justice for all requires our continued vigillance, committment, and willingness to examine each individual choice we are offered or "forced" to make. We must be able and aware enough to determine if our choices  play any role in the grand dialectical plan to advance humanity into global communitarianism.  (And yes, I have often wondered if my anticommunitarian stand made me somehow part of the dialectic.)

GoDaddy.com